Nano Banana Pro
The Most Accurate AI Image Generator
94% text rendering accuracy, native 4K output, 95%+ character consistency. Built on Gemini 3 Pro architecture.
AI Image Generator Comparison 2025
Nano Banana Pro vs Midjourney V7 vs DALL-E 3 vs FLUX.1 Kontext vs Ideogram 3.0
| Model | Release | Text Accuracy | Resolution | Speed | FID | Prompt Adherence | Price/Image |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Banana Pro ★ | 2025.11 | 94% | 4K (4096px) | 8-12s | 12.4 | 89% | $0.24 |
| Midjourney V7 | 2025.4 | 71% | 1024px | 20-30s | - | 72% | $0.30-0.60 |
| DALL-E 3 | 2024+ | 78% | 1792px | 15-25s | - | - | $0.016-0.12 |
| FLUX.1 Kontext | 2025 | - | - | 3-5s | - | - | - |
| Ideogram 3.0 | 2025 | High | - | 10-15s | - | - | - |
Best Text Rendering
Nano Banana Pro achieves 94% text accuracy, 23 points higher than Midjourney V7 (71%).
Native 4K Output
Only Nano Banana Pro supports native 4096×4096 resolution. Midjourney V7 caps at 1024px.
Lowest FID Score
FID 12.4 indicates the highest photorealism quality among all competitors.
Core Capabilities
What makes Nano Banana Pro stand out
Text Rendering
94% accuracy across multiple languages. English 94%, Chinese 88%, Japanese 85%, Korean 90%.
4K Resolution
Native 4096×4096 output. Perfect for print, billboards, and high-resolution displays.
Character Consistency
95%+ consistency across unlimited generations. Support up to 5 distinct characters.
Multi-Image Composition
Combine up to 14 reference images in a single generation for complex compositions.
Which Model Should You Use?
Quick decision guide based on your needs
| Your Need | Recommended Model |
|---|---|
| Photorealistic portraits | Nano Banana Pro |
| Artistic / creative styles | Midjourney V7 |
| Text rendering / typography | Ideogram 3.0 |
| Precise image editing | FLUX.1 Kontext |
| Product photography | Nano Banana Pro |
| Fast generation / beginners | Nano Banana Pro |
Use Case Rankings
Best models for each scenario (ranked 1-3)
📸 Photorealistic Portraits
Best realism, skin texture, fast generation
Excellent detail, 73% win rate in tests
Strong consistency, editing-focused
🎨 Artistic / Creative Styles
Industry standard for artistic output
Dreamy illustrations, simple prompts
Can simulate styles, but leans realistic
✏️ Text Rendering / Graphics
Best typography and layout control
94% text accuracy, multilingual
Precise HEX colors and labels
🖌️ Image Editing / Multi-Image
Instruction-based, precise edits
Multi-turn editing, blend up to 14 images
Good parameter control, but slower
Official Resources
Direct access to Google's official Nano Banana Pro resources
AI Image Generation Ecosystem
Explore other leading AI image generators
Midjourney
Leading AI art generator known for artistic and fantastical imagery.
→ VisitDALL-E 3
OpenAI's image generator with strong prompt adherence.
→ VisitFLUX.1
Black Forest Labs' fast and high-quality image model.
→ VisitIdeogram
Specialized in text rendering and typography in images.
→ VisitFrequently Asked Questions
Is Nano Banana Pro better than Midjourney?
For text accuracy (94% vs 71%), resolution (4K vs 1024px), and speed (8-12s vs 20-30s), Nano Banana Pro outperforms. Midjourney excels in artistic creativity and fantastical scenes.
Does Nano Banana Pro support Chinese text?
Yes. Chinese text accuracy is approximately 88%, Japanese 85%, Korean 90%. English achieves the highest at 94%.
How to get the best text rendering results?
Use quotation marks for text, specify font style, keep text short (single words achieve 97% accuracy), and use contrasting backgrounds.
How much does Nano Banana Pro cost?
Official pricing: $0.04/image (1K), $0.139/image (2K), $0.24/image (4K). Free tier offers 2-3 images/day.
Which AI image generator is fastest?
FLUX.1 Kontext (3-5s) is fastest, followed by Nano Banana Pro (8-12s for 4K), Ideogram 3.0 (10-15s), DALL-E 3 (15-25s), and Midjourney V7 (20-30s).
This website is an independent information resource. We are not affiliated with Google, xAI, OpenAI, Midjourney, or any other AI company referenced on this site. All model details, benchmarks, and comparisons are compiled from publicly available sources, official documentation, and reputable third‑party evaluations.